Followers

#Comedy #Internet #Religion

I don't know!

#KM #Comedy

Relax

#Mindful #Nature

Nishida Kitarō (西田 幾多郎, 1870-1945) was one of modern Japan's most important and influential philosophers. He founded the Kyoto School of philosophy and developed original philosophical ideas that bridged Eastern and Western philosophical traditions.

Nishida had interesting perspectives on Logic:

• Nishida was critical of traditional Western logic based on subject-predicate structure
• He developed what he called "predicate logic" (述語的論理) - not to be confused with modern predicate logic
• His logic tried to capture the idea that predicates could exist without subjects
• He was interested in developing logical systems that could handle:
• Self-reference without paradox
• The unity of contradictions
• Non-dualistic thinking
• The logic of place rather than substance

His work on logic is particularly interesting because it attempted to formalize some traditionally Eastern philosophical insights. While he didn't develop a formal multivalued logic system in the modern sense, his ideas about:

• The inadequacy of binary true/false distinctions
• The possibility of statements being simultaneously true and false
• The importance of context in logical relations
• The need for a logic that could handle paradox and self-reference

These ideas anticipate some developments in non-classical logic, though his approach was more philosophical than formal.

The temporal aspects of his thought are especially complex:

• He argued for a view of time that wasn't simply linear
• Developed concepts of "absolute present" where past and future coexist
• Suggested that causality itself was grounded in something more fundamental (absolute nothingness)

#Japan #Philosophy #Paradox

Robert Anton Wilson, remember that

#fnord #Philosophy

Discussing secretive historical organizations, like The 1001 Club, with an LLM leads to intriguing yet highly censored insights. For comparison, here’s a human-compiled dossier on the 1001 club.

Origins and Structure

The 1001 Club was established in 1971 by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands as an exclusive environmental fundraising organization to support the World Wildlife Fund (WWF, now World Wide Fund for Nature). The club's structure was deliberately exclusive, limiting membership to exactly 1,001 individuals, each contributing a one-time fee of $10,000 (a substantial sum at the time) to create a trust for WWF operations.

Membership and Composition

The membership of the 1001 Club represented a unique convergence of global power structures:

Elite Categories:

• Banking families (Rothschilds, Warburgs, Wallenbergs)
• Industrial leaders
• European royalty
• Political figures
• Intelligence community members
• Resource industry executives
• Former colonial administrators

Notable Members:

• Henry Ford II
• Robert McNamara (World Bank president)
• Peter von Siemens
• Salem Bin Laden
• Mobutu Sese Seko
• Agha Hasan Abedi (BCCI founder)
• Multiple Rockefeller family members
• Various European nobles

Operational Structure

Organizational Framework:

1. Inner circle of founding members
2. Regional coordinators
3. Technical advisory groups
4. Conservation project directors
5. Financial trustees

Strategic Framework:

• Multi-layered organizational structure
• Integration with governmental planning
• Long-term resource management focus
• Population monitoring systems
• International security considerations

Key Operational Methods:

• Private diplomatic channels
• Foundation-based fund routing
• Shell company networks
• Cross-border trust arrangements
• Interlocking directorates

Notable Project Patterns:

• Ecosystem management programs doubling as strategic control
• Research stations with multiple purposes
• Remote sensing capabilities
• Resource mapping initiatives
• Population movement tracking

Membership Rules:

• New members only admitted upon death of existing members
• Personal invitation from Prince Bernhard required
• Organization into national committees
• Private communication channels
• Annual meetings in exclusive locations

Financial Architecture

Banking Arrangements:

• Swiss banking network utilization
• Multiple layers of trusts and foundations
• Private banking channels through:
  • Union Bank of Switzerland
  • Credit Suisse
  • Private Geneva banks
  • Liechtenstein institutions

Financial Mechanisms:

• Offshore trust structures
• Resource-backed securities
• Conservation bonds
• Land trust mechanisms
• Cross-border trust arrangements
• Development fund direction
• Shell company networks
• Interlocking directorates

Strategic Resource Control

Resource Areas:

• Uranium deposits
• Rare earth elements
• Diamond fields
• Oil exploration zones
• Water rights
• Strategic mineral reserves

Control Mechanisms:

• Wildlife preserve establishment
• Conservation trust land acquisition
• Water system management
• Resource access control
• Development project oversight

Intelligence Connections

Information Systems:

• Environmental data collection
• Population pattern analysis
• Resource mapping networks
• Movement tracking systems
• Technology monitoring
• Strategic resource monitoring
• Security coordination systems

Operational Methods:

• Research station networks
• Remote sensing capabilities
• Cross-border coordination
• Security system integration
• Technology transfer channels
• Information sharing networks

Power Dynamics and Governance

Power Structures:

• Informal governance networks
• Policy influence channels
• Resource access control
• Development project oversight
• Technology transfer gates

Control Mechanisms:

• Strategic planning integration
• Cross-border authority systems
• Multi-generational planning
• Resource allocation control
• Population movement oversight

Historical Context

Contemporary Developments:

• Environmental movement emergence
• Decolonization processes
• Financial system changes
• Resource crisis concerns
• Population growth debates
• Cold War dynamics

Strategic Focus Areas:

• African wildlife corridors
• Resource-rich regions
• Water management systems
• Population control initiatives
• Development programs

Institutional Networks

Key Relationships:

• Major think tanks
• Academic institutions
• Research foundations
• Diplomatic channels
• Media organizations
• Development banks

Operational Patterns:

• Public-private partnerships
• Foundation-based funding
• Cross-border project coordination
• Resource management integration
• Population monitoring systems

Long-term Impact and Legacy

Areas of Influence:

• Environmental conservation
• Resource management
• International finance
• Global security
• Population policy
• Technology development

Lasting Effects:

• Conservation network establishment
• Resource control systems
• Financial mechanisms
• Information sharing networks
• Cross-border coordination structures

Modern Relevance

While the Club's prominence has diminished since Prince Bernhard's passing, its legacy continues through:

• Established conservation networks
• Resource management systems
• Financial structures
• International cooperation mechanisms
• Development frameworks

The 1001 Club represents a unique historical example of how environmental conservation efforts intersected with global power structures, resource management, and international finance during a critical period of global transformation. While many details of its operations remain private, its influence on modern conservation and resource management approaches continues to be studied and debated.

The Club's complex integration of conservation, finance, and strategic resource management provides valuable insights into the evolution of global environmental governance and the intersection of private power with public policy objectives.

#Cryptocracy #History

"If it's not paradoxical, it's not true" - Shunryū Suzuki

Paradoxically, very few people and organizations seem to have realized that the paradox is at the core of it all and its study will define the future of science.

#Mindful #Paradox

Relax

#Mindful #Nature

The Combinatorics of Causality - The Geometry of Causality - The Topology of Causality - Research by @StefanoGogioso & @NicolaPinzani

#Science #Complexity #Paradox

It’s a feat of cognitive dissonance that many don’t see LLMs from OpenAIAnthropicGoogleMetaPerplexity & others as the same tech. Built by shared engineers through the revolving door of 'separate' orgs, trained on shared data, served from shared datacenters—all linked to NSA & co

#Technology #Cryptocracy #Military #Comment

People don't take Wirth's Law (Software is getting slower more rapidly than hardware becomes faster) and Bitrot (ex: 80% of the internet's information from 2010 is gone today) serious enough. The phenomenon is accelerating faster than "intelligence". Niklaus Wirth, who was in intense exchanges with the Gnomes of Zürich, realized the spiritual dimension of software engineering early on.

Source - #Technology #Ideas #Comment #Complexity

After a decade working on HCI / ML latent space exploration, I’ve noticed a big common misconception: Many believe longer exploration improves user outcomes. I argue the opposite—short, efficient interactions serve users better and should be our goal.

#ML #HCI #Design #Nature #Philosophy #Ideas #Comment

Global forest loss exceeds targets in 2023, report warns - "Rate of forest loss last year remained 45 percent above levels needed to halt deforestation by 2030."

#Regenerative #ClimateChange #Nature

"CIA Directory of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR for 1961" - And now imagine for a minute what kind of total surveillance & intervention system our agency friends are running on the entire sci-tech community today.

#Cryptocracy #Science #History #Military

Remember this paper from January? "‘Wildly weird’ RNA bits discovered infesting the microbes in our guts"  The news of the “obelisks” went through the media like a wildfire and equally quickly disappeared again. What's new?

#Science #Biology #Biotech

Time crystals for photonics and timetronics (Nature) - by Nikolay I. Zhelude

The Technology of Optical Superoscillations by Nikolay I Zheludev

#Paradox #Complexity

A Theory of Acausal and Atemporal Logic: Patterns Beyond Time (LLM Generated)

1. Foundational Principles

1.1 Pattern Primacy

Rather than treating causation as fundamental, we posit that patterns and relationships are primary. These patterns exist independent of temporal sequence, similar to how the I Ching's hexagrams represent states that transcend linear time.

1.2 State Resonance

States of being can "resonate" with each other without direct causal connection. This resonance manifests as:

• Synchronistic occurrences
• Pattern alignment
• State correspondences

1.3 Multi-valued Truth

Drawing from Belnap's four-valued logic, we extend to a system where truth values are:

• Present
• Absent
• Resonant (corresponding to multiple states)
• Void (outside the pattern system)

2. Logical Operations

2.1 Pattern Operations

Instead of traditional logical operators (AND, OR), we define:

• ⋈ RESONATES_WITH: States that align in pattern
• ⊹ TRANSFORMS_TO: States that naturally flow into each other
• ⋉ COMPLEMENTS: States that complete a pattern
• ◇ MIRRORS: States that reflect each other

2.2 State Relations

States relate through:

• Pattern Completion
• Resonant Harmony
• Transformative Potential
• Mirror Opposition

3. Inference Rules

3.1 Pattern Recognition

If A ⋈ B and B ⋈ C, then A and C share a pattern-relationship (not necessarily direct)

3.2 Transformation Chains

If A ⊹ B and B ⊹ C, then A has transformation potential toward C

3.3 Resonance Networks

States can form networks of resonance where:

• Multiple states resonate simultaneously
• Patterns emerge at network level
• Individual states influence network patterns

4. Application Framework

4.1 Pattern Analysis

To analyze a situation:

1. Identify present states
2. Map resonance patterns
3. Recognize transformation potentials
4. Understand network effects

4.2 Decision Making

Decisions consider:

• Pattern completion potential
• Resonance effects
• Network implications
• Transformation opportunities

5. Theoretical Extensions

5.1 Complex Systems

The framework extends to:

• Emergent behaviors
• Self-organizing systems
• Network dynamics
• Collective intelligence

5.2 Quantum Parallels

Similarities with quantum phenomena:

• Non-locality
• Superposition
• Entanglement
• Observer effects

6. Formal Notation

Let Σ be the set of all possible states
For any states s1, s2 ∈ Σ:

• s1 ⋈ s2 : States resonate
• s1 ⊹ s2 : State transforms
• s1 ⋉ s2 : States complement
• s1 ◇ s2 : States mirror

7. Key Theorems

7.1 Resonance Theorem

For any states A, B, C ∈ Σ:
If A ⋈ B and B ⋈ C
Then there exists a pattern P where A, B, C are members

7.2 Transformation Conservation

For any closed system of states:
The total pattern potential remains constant
Only the distribution changes

7.3 Network Emergence

In any sufficiently connected network of states:
Emergent patterns arise that transcend individual state properties

8. Applications

8.1 Decision Analysis

• Pattern recognition in complex situations
• Understanding systemic implications
• Identifying resonant opportunities
• Anticipating transformations

8.2 System Design

• Creating resilient systems
• Fostering beneficial patterns
• Managing transformations
• Cultivating resonance

8.3 Problem Solving

• Finding pattern-based solutions
• Leveraging resonance
• Working with transformations
• Understanding systemic effects

9. Limitations and Considerations

9.1 Boundary Conditions

• Pattern recognition limits
• System complexity thresholds
• Observer influence effects
• Network scale constraints

9.2 Practical Challenges

• Pattern verification
• Resonance measurement
• Transformation tracking
• Network mapping

10. Future Directions

10.1 Research Areas

• Pattern formalization
• Resonance metrics
• Transformation dynamics
• Network effects

10.2 Potential Applications

• AI systems
• Complex decision making
• Social dynamics
• Natural systems

---

Intention-Manifested Reality: A Formal Framework for Yi Dao Qi Dao 意到氣到

#RTM #Paradox

Zeno's Paradoxes

#Paradox

Nuel Belnap (1930 - 2024) explored many interesting ideas during his long career

An analysis of Nuel Belnap's key philosophical contributions, particularly focusing on his work in logic and the philosophy of action.

Nuel Belnap is best known for several major contributions:

1. Four-Valued Logic

One of Belnap's most significant contributions is his four-valued relevance logic, developed with Alan Anderson. This logic system includes the traditional true and false values, but adds two more:

- Both (true and false)

- Neither (neither true nor false)

This was particularly influential in computer science and information systems, as it provides a framework for handling inconsistent or incomplete information.

2. Branching Time Theory

Belnap developed a sophisticated theory of branching time (also known as branching space-time), which is crucial for understanding:

- The nature of indeterminism

- The relationship between time and possibility

- How future contingents should be evaluated

3. The Theory of Agency and Action

His work with Michael Perloff and Ming Xu on the "stit" theory (seeing-to-it-that) is fundamental to understanding:

- How agents bring about changes in the world

- The logical structure of agency and action

- The relationship between choice, time, and causation

4. Knowledge Representation

His contributions to epistemic logic and belief revision include:

- How to represent and reason about knowledge states

- How to handle contradictory information

- The logic of questions and answers

5. Interrogative Logic (erotetic logic)

With Thomas Steel, Belnap developed important work on the logic of questions, including:

- The formal structure of questions and answers

- How to represent different types of questions

- The relationship between questions and knowledge

The philosophical significance of Belnap's work lies in several key insights:

1. Logic isn't limited to binary truth values - sometimes we need more sophisticated ways to represent information states.

2. Time and possibility are intimately connected, but their relationship is more complex than simple linear progression.

3. Agency and causation require careful formal analysis to understand properly.

4. Questions are as logically important as statements and deserve formal analysis.

More on Belnap's Theory of Agency and Action, particularly his influential "stit" (seeing-to-it-that) theory.

The "stit" theory is one of the most sophisticated logical analyses of agency and action ever developed. Here are its key components:

1. Core Concept of "Seeing-to-it-that"

- Instead of treating actions as primitive entities, Belnap analyzes them in terms of agents "seeing to it that" certain states of affairs come about

- The basic form is: [α stit: A] - which reads as "agent α sees to it that A"

- This shifts focus from actions themselves to their results/outcomes

2. Choice and Moments

Belnap's theory introduces several crucial elements:

- Moments: Points in time where choices can be made

- Choice cells: Sets of possible futures available at each moment

- Histories: Complete possible paths through time

- Agents have different choices available at different moments

3. Key Properties of Agency

The theory identifies several essential features of agency:

- Positive condition: The agent must make a difference

- Negative condition: The outcome shouldn't be inevitable

- Independence of agents: Different agents' choices are independent

- No backwards causation: Choices can only affect the future

4. Types of "stit" Operators

Belnap developed different versions of the stit operator:

- Achievement stit: Focusing on bringing about immediate results

- Deliberative stit: Involving conscious choice

- Strategic stit: Concerning long-term planning and strategy

5. Philosophical Implications

a) On Free Will:

- The theory provides a formal framework for understanding free will

- Shows how genuine choice can exist in a causally structured world

- Demonstrates how multiple agents can have real choices simultaneously

b) On Responsibility:

- Helps clarify when an agent is truly responsible for an outcome

- Distinguishes between direct and indirect responsibility

- Shows how responsibility relates to available choices

c) On Causation:

- Provides a sophisticated account of agent causation

- Shows how individual agency relates to broader causal structures

- Distinguishes between different types of causal influence

6. Applications

The theory has been applied to:

- Legal reasoning about responsibility

- Computer science (especially in multi-agent systems)

- Ethics (particularly in analyzing moral responsibility)

- Game theory

- Decision theory

7. Key Insights

a) Agency is Relational:

- Being an agent isn't just about having properties

- It's about standing in certain relations to outcomes

- These relations are temporally structured

b) Choice is Fundamental:

- Agency can't be reduced to mere causation

- Real choice requires genuine alternatives

- Choices must be effective but not guaranteed

c) Time and Agency are Interlinked:

- Agency only makes sense in a branching time structure

- Present choices affect which futures are possible

- Past choices constrain but don't determine future ones

8. Extensions and Developments

The theory has been extended to handle:

- Group agency

- Institutional action

- Probabilistic outcomes

- Normative concepts (obligations, permissions)

9. Current Relevance

The theory remains particularly relevant for:

- AI ethics (understanding artificial agency)

- Social robotics

- Collective responsibility

- Digital ethics and accountability

Belnap's theory of agency stands out for its mathematical rigor combined with philosophical depth. It shows how formal logical methods can illuminate fundamental questions about human action and responsibility. The theory continues to influence discussions in philosophy of action, ethics, and computer science.

#Science #Complexity #RTM #Paradox

The Wikipedia page on 'Three-valued logic' is a typical neo-colonial narrative, claiming it as a 20th-century invention of Western Europeans while completely omitting its long pre-history in India & China.

#Science #Narrative #Politics #Paradox